Margo Feinstein (Connolly)
Dear California-Resident Bulldogs,
Tragically, I lost a sister to non-smoker lung cancer—likely from secondhand smoke. She really suffered physically; nobody deserves that. Many of you have also lost friends and relatives to terrible tobacco-related diseases over the years.
I volunteer many long hours to fight cancer. Today, I ask a few minutes of your time to read the following, and then I ask California residents to please email your California State Senator and Assemblymember, asking them to VOTE “YES” on 7 pending, life-saving tobacco-related bills.
Many state legislators accept campaign contributions and “gifts” from Tobacco (over $60 million in past five years!), so we must be persistent.
SAVE LIVES CALIFORNIA, a coalition of American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network, American Heart Assn., American Lung Assn., state medical and dental associations, and many, many individuals are lobbying our state assemblymembers and senators to pass these tobacco-related bills in the current EXTRAORDINARY session. The final votes will take place this week. It would be most effective if you could please contact your district legislators today!!
http://www.savelivescalifornia.com/
My letter asking for voters to contact their reps regarding the $2/pack cigarette tax that could save so many lives and the general pool of taxpayers billions in Medi-Cal bills over time appears in today’s Contra Costa Times (scroll down to see letter):
http://www.contracostatimes.com/opinion/ci_28758269/sept-7-letters-to-the-editor
Here are summaries of the other endorsed bills:
Notes: The names in parentheses are the legislative authors. SB is a Senate bill. AB is an Assembly bill. If you want a voice, please email your legislators via their websites NOW. Thanks for caring!
Talking Point for Each Bill
SBX2-5 (Leno) / ABX2-6 (Cooper), which would add electronic cigarettes to the existing definition of tobacco products;
This bill is critical to keep kids from getting addicted to nicotine and to prevent the public from inhaling harmful second hand e-cigarette aerosol
SBX2-6 (Monning) / ABX2-7 (Stone), which would add hotel lobbies, small businesses, break rooms and tobacco retailers to the list of smoke-free workplaces under state law;
Californians deserve to breathe smoke-free air at work and should not have to choose between a good job and good health. California passed the first smoke-free workplace law in the nation twenty years ago. But since then, 24 states have passed stronger laws and the CDC no longer considers California a smoke-free state. It is time to update our law and remove its loopholes.
SBX2-7 (Hernandez) / ABX2-8 (Wood), which would increase the minimum age for purchasing tobacco products to 21 years old;
The Institute of Medicine reports that implementation of this policy nationwide would result in a 12% reduction in smoking prevalence.
SBX2-8 (Liu) / ABX2-9 (Thurmond), which would require all schools in the state to be tobacco-free – including e-cigarettes;
Our children should not be exposed to tobacco use in their place of learning. Currently only school districts that receive state funding for tobacco education are required to have tobacco free campuses. This means that almost half our schools are not tobacco free. All schools should be completely free of tobacco – including e-cigarettes.
SBX2-9 (McGuire) / ABX2-10 (Bloom), which would allow local jurisdictions across the state to place a tobacco tax proposal before the voters
Local cities and counties throughout the nation tax tobacco. In fact, there are more than 600 localities that raise more than $430 million nationwide through local tobacco taxes. Unfortunately, in California, state law currently prohibits local tobacco taxes. Citizens in our 58 counties should be able to decide for themselves whether or not to tax tobacco.
SBX2-10 (Beall) / ABX2-11 (Nazarian), which would revise the state tobacco licensing fee program so that fees pay for the program and no longer raid tobacco control funds. The existing tobacco fees on retailers and distributors do not generate enough revenue to pay for the costs of administering and enforcing tobacco sales laws. To make up the deficit, that state has been raiding tobacco tax revenue that pays for critical tobacco prevention and education programs. This bill would raise the licensing fees high enough to pay for the cost of the program and avoid diversion of tobacco tax funds (Proposition 99 and Proposition 10) intended for other purposes.
Tobacco Tax:
• An increase in the tobacco tax of $2/pack of cigarettes would save lives—please see letter-to-the editor in CCTimes in above link for more facts
Below is a link to find your California District Senator and Assemblymember. Once you see the name, click on the link, and then look on the legislator’s website for email link. Make sure you fill in your address to indicate that you are a constituent. You can probably email them both in five minutes, and your voice may help to save thousands of lives and billions of taxpayer dollars. These really do get read and tallied!
Also—if you have healthcare industry credentials, or if you are a veteran, please mention that in your email, as this has an impact.
http://findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov/
Thank you ahead for your attention to this very urgent task!
Sharing this request for action with others on social media or other Californians who care ASAP would help our cause.
Sorry this was so long! It is so important!
Margo (Feinstein) Connolly
|